Shaped Charge Hydrodynamic Limit Penetration Formula

(Created May 2024)

Sources:
Technology of Tanks by Richard M. Ogorkiewicz
A Jet Penetration Model Incorporating Effects of Compressibility and Target Strength by William J. Flis

This equation is derived from Birkhoff's Hydrodynamic (incompressible) Bernoulli formula, and is known variously as:

Depending on who you ask.

To find for Penetration:

OR

(both equations are the same mathematically; they're just different ways of showing a square root)


To find for Jet Length:

Where:

T = Thickness of Armor Penetrated (millimeters)
L = Length of Shaped Charge Jet (millimeters)
DJ = Density of Jet Material (kg/m3)
DT = Density of Target Material (kg/m3)

Hydrodynamic Limit Penetration Calculator


Shaped Charge Jet Length
Shaped Charge Liner Material Density
Target Material Density

Penetration (Length)

Validity of the Hydrodynamic Formula

The formula works really well when both the target and the shaped charge liner are made of the same thing, i.e. Steel Liner vs Rolled Homogenous Armor (RHA), and thus have unity (or near 1) ratios in densities. However, as target densities wildly diverge, so does penetration.

Another factor (found out by Eichelberger in Experimental Test of the Theory of Penetration by Metallic Jets [J. Appl. Phys. 27, 63–68 (1956)]) was that as the shape charge jet loses velocity, the compressive yield strength of both target and jet material comes into play. Effectively, at short standoffs and high jet velocities, the Hydrodynamic Limit formula works well, but breaks down as the jet slows down while penetrating extremely thick targets.

This is why if you put the exact same shaped charge against mild steel and Rolled Homogenous Armor (RHA), you'll get a totally different result, due to the difference in compressive/yield strengths of the two steels.

VALIDATION OF HYDRODYNAMIC FORMULA ON MULTIPLE TARGET MATERIALS: On Global Security (LINK), there's information about the penetration of the Charge, Demolition, Shaped, 150mm into various materials obtained through empirical testing. Additionally, we know that this charge has a steel liner, resulting in the following table below:

Target Material

Target Density (g/cm3)

Computed Penetration
T = L (DJ / DT)0.5

(178mm jet)

Actual
Penetration

Difference

Armor Plate (RHA)
(Baseline to find jet length)

7.86

178mm

178mm

0mm (0%)

Mild Steel

7.86

178mm

250mm

72mm (28.8%)

Granite

2.75

300.93mm

380mm

79.07mm (20.8%)

Reinforced Concrete

2.4

322.13mm

760mm

437.87mm (57.6%)

Sandstone

2.3

910mm

329.05mm

580.95mm (63.8%)